Scientists and designers work to solve specific problems, so why not judge our own work along the same lines?
Validity in Science
Scientists conduct experiments to learn about the world. They design each experiment to measure something specific. There are two kinds of validity to help scientists make sure they design experiments the right way.
- Internal validity is about how accurately the measured phenomenon is actually measured.
- External validity is about how accurately the measurement is to answering the real question.
For example, Pavlov famously experimented with dogs to understand human psychology. He measured the amounts of saliva the dogs produced, in order to find out if they were being conditioned.
For this example,
- Internal validity refers to how accurately the amounts of saliva were measured.
- External validity refers to how relevant the amounts of dog saliva are to human psychology.
Validity in Design
Like scientists, we designers work to solve specific problems.
If all is well, we solve these problems in the context of a larger strategy or bigger picture.
- Internal validity refers to how well the designed thing fulfills its purpose.
- External validity refers to the relevance of that purpose to the greater good of the business and its consumers.
How it Often Goes Wrong
Designers ≈ Scientists
Like scientists, designers should be evaluating their work on internal and external validity. We should be using strategy to inform the development of key performance indicators (KPI’s), which are in turn used to design a solution to achieve those KPI’s.
The company in the above example could have built up a loyal and engaged fan base if there would have been someone on the design team, after having received the brief, who asked “why?” It’s at the core of design thinking, and we need to make sure we don’t forget it.
Keep asking “why,” and stay valid, internally and externally!
(This post’s cover image is from JD Hancock)